MBTI Typology and Leadership styles (MBTI Typology and the Disruption Economy (part II)

Wednesday June 22nd, 2022 0 comments

Building on last week’s article, summarising the M.B.T.I. (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) preferences, I’d like to explore the link between it and leadership styles.

In our practice, we like to refer to an old (1969) and still so amazingly actual model, Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership, which we have slightly updated:

The model suggests that leaders can (on the horizontal axis) place a lot/no emphasis on “getting the job done” (task orientation). On the vertical axis, the same leader may be very/not relational (relationship orientation). This implies four styles (partially renamed by us): Tell (High Task/Low Relationship orientation): “There is a problem and that’s what we’ll do!”, Sell/Convince (High Task/High Relationship orientation): “There is a problem, I recommend X. Does any one have a better idea?”, Involve (Low Task/High Relationship orientation): “There is a problem, what do you recommend?” and Devolve (Low Task/Low Relationship orientation): “While you were gone, this problem emerged, boss, and this is how we solved it!”. The theory suggests that the levels of urgency (of the situation) and/or maturity of your subordinates (in dealing with the situation) should indicate the most appropriate style in dealing with the situation (hence the name of “Situational Leadership”).

The picture here above attempts to explain how different preferences react to the different styles of Leadership:

  • SJ’s (Guardians) tend to prefer order, clarity on details, rules, roles and procedures. They prefer certainty. They respect hierarchy and demand the same respect from their subordinates. At the condition, of course, that the telling style be respectful, sufficiently clear on the what and how, to grant them a full independence on implementation, SJ’s will feel comfortable with a directive style. In a leadership position, one may expect clear instructions, from an SJ leader, as well as, precise objectives and, if required, details on how to reach them. A SJ leader may sometimes come across as controlling and micro-managing. Because, they are people who like to hold their promises, SJ leaders are anxious to ensure that their teams are duly equipped to reach them and deliver what was promised to the top.
  • NF’s (Idealists) will feel flattered to be asked for their opinion on how to solve an issue. And what matters most to them, will be the fact that the leader will be present and relational. Being naturally gifted at “smelling” and dealing with manipulation (I must be one of the few exceptions to that rule😉) they will rapidly call a leader off, if his style of Selling hides an intention of Tell behind a façade of Sell. Clarity on the tasks (after a good discussion) and, more important, the impression that their point of view matters to the leader, will help NF’s feel comfortable with the Sell style. NF leaders tend to engage rather than convince or dictate. They tend to lead in an Involve way and are happy to follow a Sell leader. NF leaders tend to engage through their passion, which is fine as long as you respond positively to it. The officers daring not to share the Passion or intimate conviction of their Führer (several sources suggest he was a NF) remember though how painful it could be for their ego and career advancement. NF leaders find it challenging to deal with people not sharing the enthusiasm they have for the cause.
  • SP’s (Trouble-shooters) need freedom to try and learn by doing but they usually appreciate a relational and present style of leadership. A hands-off on the task leader, who will nevertheless be present to encourage, support and create fun and a nice experience (Involve), will be appreciated by SP preferences. Since SP’s tend to tolerate their leaders as long as those truly lead by example, they seek to be exemplary leaders themselves. But don’t be fooled, “exemplary” in their eyes, doesn’t mean scrupulously apply the rules and follow the procedures… It means create conditions for my people to do and be their best.
  • NT’s (Visionaries) are a very independent breed. They are not “freedom seekers” nor rebellious, they need to feel that they are trusted, that their competences are recognised and that they are relied upon to provide a result that will build on their knowledge. Devolve is a style they will particularly appreciate and strive-on. Since NT’s love to be independent, don’t expect them to “baby-sit” nor cuddle their team. Their expression of respect and appreciation for the people they lead, is to ensure they clearly understood the “Why” and let them get on with it.

These reflections should not be taken too literally nor rigidly. It is the situation that should be considered before any other consideration. Second, M.B.T.I. is not supposed to “put people into boxes”. My preference is NF and I remember feeling clearly safer with telling style ski instructors as I felt that my physical integrity on the slope would depend from her/his “orders” (Tell). I felt honoured and appreciated when my chief scouts, wishing to develop our self-organisation skills, were asking us our opinion prior to preparing the campsite, the food or the fire(Sell). When collaborating with NEOMA Executive Education, or our allies of StratX, I very much enjoy the friendly presence of the leading partners there who demonstrate their fullest confidence in my capacity to fulfil their mandate (Involve). Finally, I feel far more at ease writing such articles or my future book, on my own and independently, than co-writing them (Devolve).

This article’s purpose was mainly to have your reflecting on the possible connections between people preference and how to create conditions for them to flourish and two well researched tool, M.B.T.I. and Situational Leadership. Next week, we will explore M.B.T.I. and the impact of the Disruption Economy.

  • MBTI Typology and the Disruption Economy (part I)

    Saturday June 18th, 2022 0 comments

    M.B.T.I. (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) is one of the World’s most used and researched psychometrics. Invented by Mrs Briggs and her daughter, Mrs Myers, it refers to the typology of one of psychology, psychiatry and psychoanalysis “geniuses”, the Swiss Medical Doctor and researcher, Carl Jung. It is not and never, ever should be taken for, nor used as an assessment tool.…

    Read the full article →

  • Why Bezos, Jobs, Musk or Zuckerberg aren’t Disruptive Leaders

    Thursday June 9th, 2022 1 comment

    Let’s put the record straight before going any further: This article doesn’t aim at criticising any of the above mentioned leaders (leaving aside it would be a total lack of class to talk about one of them, no longer with us). I simply aim at further refining what Disruptive Leaders do and don’t do. Recently reading an article in a…

    Read the full article →

  • Of Collective intelligence, Birds, Business Organisations, Disruption Economy, Football & Special Forces

    Wednesday May 11th, 2022 0 comments

    Imagine… Imagine if what you saw here below were to inspire your business… What do these birds have in common with Business organisations, football or even Special Forces? They seek to create an intelligent organisation in order to be able to manage the complex environment which surrounds them. Let’s go back to 1806… In a summary of his book, “The…

    Read the full article →

  • Strategy won’t be about guessing the Future, but getting ready for it!

    Friday April 1st, 2022 0 comments

    When a failed comedian (softly slapped -my father was hitting harder!- by the husband of a woman he just disrespected in front of a lobotomized audience) occupies all the news website in the World, one has reasons to be  concerned, about our capacity to analyse what is critical for our Future. But, even with dramatic events such as the Covid…

    Read the full article →

  • The lethal transformation of promising start-ups into successful organisations

    Saturday March 12th, 2022 0 comments

    I have the privilege to work both for start-ups and established corporations. The first ones are, usually, very proud of their informal, relational, explorational, intelligence-driven cultures and by the fact that their people are real passionate “warriors” who do not count their hours. They sound far more like “organic communities” than stiff and crippled organisations. Their dream is to succeed,…

    Read the full article →

  • A tribute to my Ukrainian and Russian Friends

    Friday March 4th, 2022 0 comments

    “I don’t like to commit myself about heaven and hell; you see, I have friends in both places.” I always loved this quote of Mark Twain and it sadly resonates these days. My intention is not to jump on the Ukrainian slaughter bandwagon and draw abusive leadership lessons from it (although I have a deep respect for Volodymyr Zelensky, Vitali…

    Read the full article →

  • A useful tool to address conflict, dilemmas and coaching

    Saturday February 12th, 2022 0 comments

    Last week’s article on Dilemma Leadership elicited a lot of private mails, asking for support in how to identify and construct the two axis of a dilemma (between which the leader will constantly arbitrate and navigate). A Dutch client showed me a model, attributed to Dutch consultant, Daniel Ofman, and explained to me by a Dutch consultant, Jo Boniszewski, that…

    Read the full article →

  • Leading edge organizations identify & address their dilemmas

    Saturday February 5th, 2022 0 comments

    In the “Old Economy”, Problem-Solving methodologies were a must in several business schools. We were taught to: Define clearly the problem Identify its root cause Remove the cause Observe if we had satisfactorily resolved the problem. It worked well, perfectly combined with the “engineering mindset” and the linear thinking of the time. Once solved, a problem was behind our back…

    Read the full article →

  • Multitasking does not belong to the Disruption Economy

    Friday January 28th, 2022 2 comments

    I must confess that multitasking (or was it hiding my natural tendency for procrastination?) started early with me… I remember the difficulty I had to focus on doing my afternoon homework, prior to dashing out towards liberation, i.e. the football practice with my schoolmates. As an M.B.T.I. profile, my preference clearly is N (intuitive), P (Perception). Striving on opportunity grabbing,…

    Read the full article →

  • Disruptive Leadership in 2022 and beyond

    Friday January 21st, 2022 0 comments

    As per explained in my previous article, it is since 2008/2009 that my interest is focused on the “Disruption Economy” and its impact on Leadership, following a study made with 14 Brazilian C.E.O.s and Fundação Dom Cabral. Early 2020, of course, I was taken completely off-guard when realizing that disruption wasn’t necessarily caused by technology but by a virus, so…

    Read the full article →