Hollywood and Military know how to engage their organizations in the Disruption Economy

May 22, 2015 2 comments

Recently, I saw been delivered a fascinating session explaining to business executives, how professional troops were operating, under extreme conditions, when disruption and unexpected changes were the rules of the game.

speaker explained that under such conditions, the old “Command & Control” was totally inefficient and illusory, given the fact that people in operations needed to react faster than their commanders, as they were confronted to the reality of  disruption on the terrain, when their “bosses” were having to manage a much wider picture at Headquarters level.

The notion of “empowerment” which we all know, took a large part of the speaker’s demonstration: he explained that, in order to fully empower and trust the soldiers on the field, officers needed to work with the notion of “Mission Command”.

Mission Command requires:

  • Clarity on the Purpose of the mission and objective to be reached (also called “Schwerpunkt”, Point of Main Effort)
  • Clear Authorities and Boundaries
  • Accountability
  • Leadership Development

Back in 2010, in a previous post, I commented on Daniel Pink’s explanations about the counter intuitive research done at M.I.T. on motivation.

Daniel Pink follows pretty much the same rules as explained by the speaker I was listening to, on stage:

  • Autonomy: which happens when the objective is clearly defined, the boundaries are set, the authority unconditionally given and, in return accountability is accepted and taken
  • Mastery: which is needed to create trust and empowerment
  • Purpose: So that we are intellectually and emotionally aligned

Pink uses this model as a motivational tool, but what struck me is that, elite troops use it in an organizational and leadership context. Herebelow is the specific part of the speech where Pink talks about his model (5’)

Gerd Leonhard sends each week a useful summary of what struck him in terms of news and articles. “What Hollywood Can Teach Us About the Future of Work” published in the New-York Times is not a new idea. Fortune or Time magazine, 15 years ago had published something around the same idea. But the theme remains excellent: The author starts to describe the anthill impression he had when entering an abandoned office space where the scene of a movie was to be shot. Anyone not accustomed with this kind of disjoint energy spending could have wondered if those people knew what they were doing and, above all where was the person in charge of coordinating and shouting orders. Adam Davidson shares his surprise: ” Why was this process so smooth? The team had never worked together before, and the scenes they were shooting that day required many different complex tasks to happen in harmony: lighting, makeup, hair, costumes, sets, props, acting. And yet there was no transition time; everybody worked together seamlessly, instantly”.

Davidson calls this the “Hollywood Model” and forecasts that “More of us will see our working lives structured around short-­term, project-­based teams rather than long-­term, open­-ended jobs”. In my humble opinion, his article then “derails” a little bit but there is still a lot we can learn from Professional militaries as well as Hollywood movie making crews

  • Crew and soldiers have a shared higher purpose: Be the best in what they do. They live with a paradox: They have to be individual star performers and perfectly able to blend into a team (Purpose and Autonomy)
  • They have a clear objective: to ensure the success of their project or mission (Purpose)
  • They cannot become silo driven as success will clearly depend on how well their brilliance and competence will integrate with other team members speciality, edge and talent (Purpose and Mastery)
  • They, by definition, know that life time employment is not guaranteed and they have to remain “on top of their game”. Both Hollywood and professional Troops only take the fittest (Mastery and Autonomy)
  • They need to be granted clear authority in what they do and know of the boundaries or limits of it (Autonomy)
  • Being a “lone wolf” (such as the star explosives expert in the award winning movie “Hurt Locker”) no matter how brave, brilliant they are, may endanger the whole project, the success of the Mission and life of their peers. Living through the paradoxes of aspiring to be the best and remaining humble, being a sharp specialist and a team player, being excellent and focused whilst looking for diversity and respecting it are essential to shine under such conditions.
  • Diversity is endangered by the politically correct!

    May 15, 2015 14 comments

    In our network, we count 9 wemen (out of 35), 1 Algerian, 4 Americans, 1 Australian, 3 Belgians, 5 Brazilians, 7 British, 3 Canadians, 1 Congolese, 1 Dutch, 9 French, 1 German, 1 Lebanese, 1 Swede, 3 Swiss (yes it counts more than 35 as we have double nationals) and we are based in Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Honk-Kong,…

    Read the full article →

  • Your feedback and creativity are needed

    May 8, 2015 14 comments

    In the recent months, still positively influenced by Nokia’s “Connecting People” way of life and belief, I happened to match executives needing to change horizon with clients looking for the rare bird. And it seems to have been happy marriages. In each of the cases, our clients informally had turned to us, as they were unimpressed by the solution or…

    Read the full article →

  • “Insuring your costly acquisition against failure”

    May 1, 2015 0 comments

    Merging or acquiring are two highly risky decisions to take. Following several consultancies, the proportion of such operations, failing to deliver on their promises, is around 70%. Why do we get it so wrong? A paper, to which some of us contributed, brought interesting ideas forward: Jeffrey Krug in a 2009 HBR article pointed out that “The managers in charge…

    Read the full article →

  • How can I change my behaviour?

    April 24, 2015 6 comments

    Those of you who we work for, know that we use a lot the three levers of engagement (named after Aristotle famous “modes of persuasion” or rhetorical strategies): Logos (the clarity/sanity test): The intellectual lever, absolutely vital, creator of energy. People will not follow nor engage behind a leader who lacks intellectual clarity. Ethos (the credibility test): People don’t listen…

    Read the full article →

  • “It is astonishing to see how many of the behaviors we fear in one another dissipate in the presence of good relationship”

    April 18, 2015 4 comments

    Part of our practice is to be discretely flown somewhere, in an emergency mission, in order to help diffuse the dramatic effect of the falling apart between members of a leadership team. I remember being called by the Chairman of the Board and being requested to take a flight in another part of the world, to discretely meet the CEO,…

    Read the full article →

  • Show mercy for narcissistic leaders and learn how to deal with them

    March 28, 2015 2 comments

    By coincidence or synchronicity, I have been confronted recently to these complaints from some of our clients: “I was misled. I was hired for this job, on the basis of rocking the boat and shaking the hierarchy. But when I do I get punished.” “The Board started this whole process of business rejuvenation but when our team came with strong…

    Read the full article →

  • The lesson from “the ugliest woman in the world” for business leaders

    March 19, 2015 4 comments

    When Lizzie Velasquez, “visually impaired” as they say and aged 17, saw on Youtube, the title “The World’s Ugliest Woman“, she soon realized that the clip was featuring… her! I let you imagine the profound shock this young adolescent felt when, amongst the thousands of comments, she read incredibly pathetic quotes such as “Why would her parents keep her?!” or…

    Read the full article →

  • From Directors to Connectors

    March 13, 2015 3 comments

    When asked about one of the main characteristics that leaders will need to have in the Disruption Economy, Gerd Leonhard, likes to answer: “They should evolve from directors to connectors”. Business focused or socially connected? When organizations go through rough seas, it is wise that their leaders demand from their people that they focus on tasks that will help the…

    Read the full article →

  • How can I authentically talk about myself in a professional context?

    March 6, 2015 6 comments

    We have been invited with our partners of StratX, to run an ambitious development program for the top 500 of a large multinational. StratX are specialized in developing Strategic Marketing skills by their clients. One of their simulations is used by 90 of the top 100 MBA’s in the world. When we join them in a program, we observe the…

    Read the full article →

  • Your “strategy” bears the seeds of defeat. Create a “new sense of self”!

    February 27, 2015 0 comments

    My duty, when coaching, isn’t so much about teaching leaders new skills. It is to help them identify barriers (that they had once appropriately erected) or understand the self-inflicted “coping strategies” (that once were useful), which have now become unconscious burdens. As Campbell’s Hero’s Journey suggests, one of the most painful challenges for a “leader of their own life” is…

    Read the full article →